Personality Preferences and Leadership Self-Reflection
Updated: May 25
A personality-preference discussion can provide language for reflecting on how you approach work. It is one input to development, alongside feedback, work examples, skills, and the demands of your role.
Understand the boundary
The Myers-Briggs framework describes personality preferences. Its publisher states that the assessment does not measure skills or abilities and should not be used for recruitment or selection. A type label is not evidence of leadership potential or future job performance.
Turn reflection into a development question
Identify a current leadership situation, such as preparing a decision, giving feedback, or handling disagreement. Describe what you tend to do, ask for specific feedback, and choose one behavior to practice. Let the demands of the work guide the experiment.
Review behavior and outcomes separately
Use observable work, relevant feedback, and agreed measures to evaluate development. If an assessment is part of the process, explain its intended use, obtain appropriate participation agreement, and handle individual results with care. Assessment discussion does not replace a review of skills or performance.
A practical next step
Choose one recurring situation, agree on a small change, and set a review date. Record what happened, what helped, and what still needs attention. This is Ascendare Group practitioner guidance, not a claim that a personality category produces a particular business result.
Sources
The Myers-Briggs Company: MBTI assessment and intended use. https://www.themyersbriggs.com/en-US/Explore-Solutions/MBTI
The Myers & Briggs Foundation: MBTI Code of Ethics. https://www.myersbriggs.org/using-type-as-a-professional/mbti-code-of-ethics/
Put the ideas into practice
To discuss how this applies to your organization, request a consultation or start with a Business Performance Diagnostic.



Comments